Home Contact Us Stadia Pix Articles All About You Riders to Remember
DVDs Books Pictures Archive Dream Teams Programme Generator
Ivan Mauger V Britain's Best
Part 5: Chris Morton
Your Feedback
Ivan Mauger V Britain's Best
Part 4: Dave Jessup
Your Feedback
Ivan Mauger V Britain's Best
Part 3: Malcolm Simmons
Your Feedback
Ivan Mauger V Britain's Best
Part 2: Ray Wilson
Your Feedback
Ivan Mauger V Britain's Best
Part 1:Nigel Boocock
Your Feedback
Silver Machine Win Gold
Ivan's Fantasy Island
Your Feedback
Tidying Up The Parade
NZ v Australia 1980
Your Feedback
2024 is Off and Running
The Story of Noddy Holder
Your Feedback
1975/76 NZ v England
Your Feedback
DVD: Great Races of the 80s
What's Wrong With Ambition?
Your Feedback
Book Review: Walthamstow
When the Rangers Roared
High Beech Revival of 1954
Your Feedback
Western Springs Winged Wheels
Grand Pricks?
Your Feedback
Blind Speedway Rider
Track Pix: Oxford
Farcical Guest
Your Feedback
The Ole Olsen Tapes
Dream Team: Richard Cleaver
Plus Points
Your Feedback
1974/75 BL V New Zealand
Heat Details Required
Your Feedback
Northside Arena
Review: Tigers at White City
Your Feedback
How to halt the decline
NZ v Poland - 1st Test
NZ v Poland - 2nd Test
NZ v Poland - 3rd Test
NZ v Poland - 4th Test
Track Pictures: North Brisbane
It's All About You: Lionel King
Your Feedback
Dream Team : Geoff Langley
Your Feedback
Gerald Dunn's JAP
Your Feedback
1975 World Final. Heat 20.
Your Feedback
Peter Collins Autobiography
Your Feedback
DVD Review: 70s - A to Z
Your Feedback

The Bond Has Gone
By Dave Green


Periodically my favourite television soap opera undergoes a change of producer or attempts to reverse a ratings decline. This inevitably leads to an influx of new characters, often arriving en-masse as a new 'family' or as long-lost relatives of established characters. While some viewers may welcome the introduction of these new faces, I can't abide it. I've generally little interest in their activities and tend to lose interest in the programme. Of course, over time those newcomers become familiar faces and I accept them as part of the fabric of the show.

Increasingly I begin to feel similar emotions at the start of each new speedway season. All too often the riders that entertained me the previous summer have moved on to pastures new. In their place are a whole new range of 'characters'. Some of whom I've seen perform numerous times in the past, others out to make a favourable first impression on myself and my fellow supporters. It all adds a slightly surreal edge to the opening encounters of the season as I try to engender some passion for 'my team'. This is particularly true when the fixtures see one of last season's heroes make an early return in opposition colours.

As with the soap opera, I gradually come to warm to the newcomers and by mid-season can begin to sense a bond between riders and supporters. Even as I watch them I'm conscious of the fact that any connection we make with these guys is only guaranteed to last until October, then we'll start the whole process again.

In 2007 Coventry made much media capital from the fact their team was unchanged from their 2006 line-up. That this was such a reportable fact only emphasises how unusual an occurrence it was. Even that didn't last as Morten Risager lost his place to Steve Johnson before the season was out.

It wasn't always so. I can recall an era when teams were pretty much unchanged year on year. The same old faces in the same old racejackets. Even those riders that hadn't enjoyed a good year were more often than not welcomed back the following season. After all, they were part of the team.

The constant chopping and changing does little to encourage loyalty from supporters or allow them to build a meaningful relationship with the team. I feel sure this is especially the case for younger supporters, my own boyhood hero rode for my club for many seasons. Nowadays a young Coventry fan has probably thrown out numerous items of redundant Hancock, Hamill, Jonsson and Nicholls memorabilia.

I don't need to tell anyone that the points limit is largely to blame. It was initially introduced to ensure that no team became too strong, something that is as important today as it was then. Over time the emphasis on the rule changed, it became a mechanism that attempted to balance team strengths equally for all clubs. A subtle but important difference.

Now I feel its emphasis has changed again. It's now just the answer to a complicated piece of algebra. Which seven averages, largely regardless of the riders they're attached to, can be put together to get as close as possible to the target figure? The upshot is that teams no longer start with their existing team and work out how to change it to fit with the limit, they now start with a blank piece of paper and comb the world for the seven riders that will offer the best chance of success.

It's up the reader to decide if I'm correct in saying that, or whether that's necessarily even a bad thing. I just wish that we could return to the days when I could genuinely identify with the riders wearing my team's colours.


This article was first published on 13th March 2008


  • Steve Brown:

    "I agree with Dave Green 100%. It does seem that these days, the main objective is to get a team with the averages as close to the points limit as possible. Whatever happened to loyalty? It is very difficult to identify with riders today, when they are only around for a season or two. I agree with points limits, but at least make them realistic. Riders shouldn't be forced out of a team the way they are now."

  • Tony Mowles:

    "Couldn't agree more Dave, the 'mathematical' method of team building leaves many fans indifferent to their 'teams' at the start of the season and those who argue that it prompts interest during the off season are I think misguided on what fans really want. There have been many debates regarding a methodology that could encourage both club and rider to continue for season upon season and I personally favour some form of discount, be it a percentage or a fixed amount, being knocked off a returning riders average for the following season"

  • Mali:

    "I totally agree with you about not knowing who will be riding for who, year after year, it really is disappointing, especially for the younger fans. I also think that the powers that be are degrading the league, and British speedway overall, by lowering the points limit for team building. I would have thought that teams would be allowed to build to a higher points limit. There is no way the league can use the name Elite, because elite its not. The league has lost the World Champion, and some other top riders, all due to the lowering of the points limit for team building. I for one, wont be going to speedway like I used to. My partner and I were regulars at Cardiff year after year, and followers of Team GB, all over the place. I haven't booked tickets for Cardiff yet, and probably wont bother at all. I hate to say, but when our sport needed a boost, the BSPA gave it a kick up the bum instead."

    [ Use Mobile Version ]


    Comment on this Article | Contact Us | Go Back to Main Menu

  •    Please leave your comments on this article or on the site as a whole