Home Contact Us Stadia Pix Articles All About You Riders to Remember
DVDs Books Pictures Archive Dream Teams Programme Generator
28/03/2021
2020 Review - Part 8
Kualar Lumpar 2007/08
Your Feedback
 
21/03/2021
2020 Review - Part 7
Shanghai 1930
Your Feedback
 
14/03/2021
2020 Review - Part 6
Singapore 1930
Your Feedback
 
07/03/2021
2020 Review - Part 5
Peter Clark
 
28/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 4
Still Flying High
Your Feedback
 
21/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 3
Harold MacNaughton
Your Feedback
 
14/02/2021
Olle Nygren
2020 Review - Part 2
Your Feedback
 
07/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 1
Your Feedback
 
31/01/2021
Debut: Joe Screen
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
24/01/2021
Review: Blood & Cinders
Your Feedback
 
17/01/2021
Tai Deserves a Gong
The J.A.P is Modern Art
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
03/01/2021
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
27/12/2020
The Polish Problem
Mauger, Nielsen. World Finals.
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
16/12/2020
Simon Wigg Racing Plus!
 
10/12/2020
Review: Saving Speedway
 
06/12/2020
Great Races of the 70s/80s
The BLRC 1984
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
22/11/2020
Book Review: Dave Jessup
The BLRC 1983
Leif "Basse" Hveem
Your Feedback
 
15/11/2020
When Did it Start to Decline?
The BLRC 1982
Tracking Down the Swagman
Your Feedback
 
08/11/2020
Review: Before Air Fences
THE BLRC 1981
Dagenham
Your Feedback
 
01/11/2020
Review: Who Gates Wins
The BLRC 1980
Owlerton in the Sixties
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
25/10/2020
Doyle's Triple Crown
The BLRC 1979
Your Feedback
 
11/10/2020
New Cross Album 1936
The BLRC 1978
Your Feedback
 
04/10/2020
Sheffield 60s & 70s
The BLRC 1977
John Pilblad
Your Feedback
 


An Alternative GP System
by Keith Butler

Harris
Loram

Rather than argue which system is best can I widen the discussion on the World Championship a little? Like it or not, with television now a major factor in the sport we simply cannot go back to the old formula. A one-off Final, albeit great for the supporters, is not enough to interest TV and the casual armchair fans, which we are trying to entice to our stadiums. The qualifying rounds were complex and would not show enough top riders in action leading up to the final. Even the final could be a let down if too many top stars got eliminated for some reason.

That said, the current GP series leaves much to be desired. It can be all over 2-thirds of the way through. With only 15 riders taking part, some of the best riders of the year are not in contention (ie Hans Anderson in 2006). Even the points scoring system is really not as fair as it should be. Is there a solution? Probably not to please everyone, but here's a rough idea for a change in format which could be considered something of a compromise.

We increase the number of riders competing in a GP series to 32. This gives us a 2 semi-final mini-series (say 4 or 5 venues each) of which the top 8 from each would qualify for the Final series (4 or 5 again?) to decide the year's champion. With a reduced number of GP's for a final it would increase the probability of only being decided at the last event. To explain this more fully:

We have a GP semi-final A series & B series, comprising of 4 or 5 venues each. The top 8 riders from the previous year would qualify as seeds to the S-F's (1,4,5 & 8 in s-f A with 2,3,6 & 7 in s-f B). The other 8 finalists would also have qualified but would be drawn out of a hat, 4 in each s-f. The other 16 semi-finalists would have come through qualifying rounds the previous season.

From each s-f the top 8 would then compete in the GP final series at another 4 or 5 venues with all riders starting from scratch again. From which the top scorer becomes World Champion. The top 8 becoming seeds the following season.

Qualifying for the GP series could be achieved by having all riders not involved in the GP s-f's competing in a pre-determined system which would eventually arrive at 48 riders qualifying for 4 Quarter-finals along with the 16 eliminated GP riders (4 in each). Top 8 from each go to the qualification semis & the top 8 from each semi reach the GP qualification final. From the final the top 10 would automatically join the GP series next year. This leaves 6 places, which could be used, similar to the selection process which nominates riders now, specifically for riders who may have missed out due to injury etc.

I would also like to see the GP scoring revised to be fairer. In the GP semis you could have the 20 races with the top 4 qualifying for a double points final. Then in the GP final series, the top 8 who qualify for the meeting semis get 3 bonus points plus what they score in the semi followed by a double points final again. This would do away with the 25, 20, 18 & 16 allowance. The winner of the final would be that particular GP winner but the points would reflect the riders' performance throughout the whole meeting.

The GP semis A & B should be run on the same night and TV could decide which venue they wanted to cover, if not both. The GP semis could be spread around 8 or 10 venues accordingly with the GP finals going to another 4 or 5 venues at top tracks. At the moment the chances of breaking into the GP series is slight and doubling the amount of riders who set out on a World title quest at the outset of the season must be an improvement. There are a lot of good riders who deserve a chance at the top level. Just in Britain we should be allowing the likes of Mark Loram, Simon Stead, Chris Harris, Dave Norris & Chris Louis, amongst others, a better opportunity to mix it with the big boys.

This system would eliminate the need for riders to gamble on their being selected for the following year if they don't finish in the top 8. All 16 GP finalists know they are in the GP next season and the other 16 eliminated semi-finalists are automatically entered into the latter stages of the qualification rounds with their future in their own hands. This idea can obviously be expanded upon, but hopefully it is now in a forum as a means of getting fans discussing how we progress the sport. If more of us ordinary fans chip in with ideas then the powers that be will recognise the ones with potential and consider them objectively. I know I have suggestions that I believe would improve many aspects of the sport, it's knowing the right channels to go through which I (& others like me) are unsure of.

One final thought, which may help improve the GP's. With them all being televised, all the racing incidents requiring an exclusion could be analysed by the referee & 2 ex-riders. A 2 out 3 verdict would then decide the outcome. Over the last few years we've seen decisions to exclude riders, after crashes, which have ranged from poor to downright atrocious. Experienced riders generally recognise what causes a crash and their insight would make the decision justified. This is not a reflection on the referee, merely an acknowledgment of how difficult their task can be.

 

This article was first published on 12th October 2006

[ Use Mobile Version ]
 

 

Comment on this Article | Contact Us | Go Back to Main Menu

   Please leave your comments on this article or on the site as a whole